Renault Clio 2003 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 177 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 200 NM | 94 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 7.4 - 15.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 8.6 | |
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.81 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 210 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 992 litres | |
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 45 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The Peugeot 206 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 45 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`547 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |