Renault Clio 2003 vs Peugeot 206 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Renault Clio
2003 - 2005
Peugeot 206
2002 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.1 - 1.61.1 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 60 - 110 HP60 - 177 HP
Torque: 93 - 200 NM94 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 15 seconds7.4 - 15.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.2 - 7.44.3 - 8.6
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m3.82 m
Width: 1.64 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres210 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1037 litres992 litres
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 45 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The Peugeot 206 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 45 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`501~ 1`547
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Renault Clio has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Peugeot 206 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv