Renault Clio 2003 vs Opel Corsa 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 60 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 200 NM | 88 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 9 - 18 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.4 - 7.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Corsa. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Corsa, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 1060 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres less trunk space than the Opel Corsa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Corsa (by 23 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`471 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |