Renault Clio 2003 vs Citroen C2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 61 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 200 NM | 94 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 15 seconds | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.4 | 4.1 - 6.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C2. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Renault Clio is 14 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1037 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 62 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 158 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`501 | ~ 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |