Renault Clio 2005 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 140 HP | 55 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 - 240 NM | 108 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 15.2 seconds | 7.5 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.9 | 4.4 - 7.9 | |
|
On average, the Renault Clio petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger. Renault Clio is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1030 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 18 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`656 | ~ 1`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |