Renault Clio 2005 vs Renault Modus 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 140 HP | 65 - 113 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 240 NM | 105 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 15.2 seconds | 10 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.9 | 4.5 - 7.5 | |
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Modus. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 3.79 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.59 m | |
Renault Clio is 17 cm longer than the Renault Modus, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 274 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 1283 litres | |
Renault Clio has 14 litres more trunk space than the Renault Modus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 248 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Modus, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`656 | ~ 1`653 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Renault Modus has
| |