Renault Clio 2005 vs Ford KA 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Renault Clio is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 - 140 HP | 69 - 75 HP | |
Torque: | 93 - 240 NM | 102 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 15.2 seconds | 13 - 13.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.9 | 4.2 - 5.1 | |
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford KA. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 3.62 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 34 cm longer than the Ford KA, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 224 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1035 litres | 710 litres | |
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Renault Clio has 64 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 325 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 9.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 2 metres more than that of the Ford KA, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`656 | ~ 1`368 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford KA has
| |