Renault Clio 2008 vs Hyundai i20 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 128 HP | 75 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 - 220 NM | 119 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 13.4 seconds | 9.5 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.5 | 4.4 - 6.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i20. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i20. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 9 cm longer than the Hyundai i20, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 288 litres | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 7 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i20. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.3 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`628 | ~ 1`588 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |