Renault Clio 2012 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but slightly lower. Renault Clio is 12 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 1 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 295 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 5 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |