Renault Clio 2012 vs Peugeot 208 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 68 - 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 95 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | 6.5 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.4 - 5.6 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 208. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 208. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Renault Clio is 11 cm longer than the Peugeot 208, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 311 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1076 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Renault Clio has 11 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 208. This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 208. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`613 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Peugeot 208 has
| |