Renault Clio 2012 vs Hyundai i30 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 90 - 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 137 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | 11 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 4.4 - 6.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i30. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 21 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Renault Clio has 40 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`777 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |