Renault Clio 2012 vs Hyundai i20 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 75 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 122 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | 10.2 - 16 seconds | |
| In general, Renault Clio are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Hyundai i20. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.2 - 6.7 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai i20. On average, a Renault Clio with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Hyundai i20. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Hyundai i20 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 4 cm longer than the Hyundai i20, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1146 litres | 1042 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 104 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.4 metres more than that of the Hyundai i20, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`653 kg | ~ 1`624 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`095 kg | ~ 1`083 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 558 kg | ~ 541 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests, but Hyundai i20 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Hyundai i20 has
| |