Renault Clio 2012 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 200 HP | 70 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 240 NM | 115 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.1 seconds | 11.3 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 7.2 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Aveo. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.07 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.52 m | |
| Renault Clio is 3 cm longer than the Chevrolet Aveo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 653 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 10 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`594 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |