Renault Clio 2019 vs Mazda 2 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, lPG, hybrid) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 130 HP | 75 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 260 NM | 123 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 17.1 seconds | 9.1 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.8 | 4.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.50 m | |
| Renault Clio is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 10 cm wider, while the height of Renault Clio is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 391 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1069 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Clio has 111 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`657 | ~ 1`531 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |