Renault Clio 2016 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Skoda Fabia has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 90 HP | 75 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 220 NM | 95 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 12.3 seconds | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| In general, Skoda Fabia are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Clio. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 5.6 | 3.4 - 4.8 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Clio is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1395 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Clio uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 950 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`623 kg | ~ 1`615 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`061 kg | ~ 1`137 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 562 kg | ~ 478 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Skoda Fabia. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |