Renault Clio 2016 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Opel Mokka has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Clio is available only with front wheel drive, while Opel Mokka can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Opel Mokka is available also with LPG engines. LPG engines generally provide lower running costs and cleaner emissions compared to petrol and diesel engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 90 HP | 110 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 220 NM | 155 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 12.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.5 seconds | |
| In general, Opel Mokka are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Clio. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 5.6 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Mokka. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Mokka can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 1 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 927 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`623 kg | ~ 1`929 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`061 kg | ~ 1`471 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 562 kg | ~ 458 kg | |
| Renault Clio load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Opel Mokka. Therefore, Renault Clio is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |