Renault Clio 2016 vs Volvo V60 Cross Country 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo V60 Cross Country has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Clio is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V60 Cross Country can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 90 HP | 150 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 220 NM | 350 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 12.3 seconds | 6.8 - 9.1 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo V60 Cross Country are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Clio. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 5.6 | 4.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60 Cross Country. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60 Cross Country. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 Cross Country can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Renault Clio is smaller. Renault Clio is 37 cm shorter than the Volvo V60 Cross Country, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Clio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1241 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V60 Cross Country may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V60 Cross Country (by 796 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo V60 Cross Country, which means Renault Clio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`623 kg | ~ 2`253 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Volvo V60 Cross Country has
| |