Renault Clio 2016 vs Mazda 2 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.6 | 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 220 HP | 75 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 260 NM | 135 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 14.5 seconds | 8.7 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 5.9 | 3.4 - 4.9 | |
|
Renault Clio petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Renault Clio equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 2 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Renault Clio is larger, but lower. Renault Clio and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 950 litres | |
| Renault Clio has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Clio is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Renault Clio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`678 | ~ 1`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Clio has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |