Renault Captur 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 48 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 102 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.9 | |
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Captur could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Opel Crossland | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Renault Captur engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.12 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Captur is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | no data | |
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 27 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The Peugeot 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`729 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 12 200 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |