Renault Captur 2018 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.1 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Renault Captur engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.64 m | |
| Renault Captur is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Renault Captur has 7 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`729 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |