Renault Captur 2018 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 242 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 10 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.8 | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Captur could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Kia XCeed | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller, but higher. Renault Captur is 22 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 395 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1301 litres | |
| Renault Captur has 18 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 66 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`729 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i30 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |