Renault Captur 2018 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 10 HP more power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Hyundai Kona. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.3 | |
|
The Hyundai Kona is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Captur could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Captur engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai i30, Kia RIO, Kia Picanto, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Kona, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1143 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 16 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The Hyundai Kona may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 92 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`729 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |