Renault Captur 2017 vs Seat Arona 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 5 HP less power than Seat Arona, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Seat Arona. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 | 4.2 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Arona, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Seat Arona can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Seat Arona version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Arona, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1280 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 55 litres more trunk space than the Seat Arona. The Seat Arona may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Arona, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`759 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Arona, so Renault Captur quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Seat Arona has
| |