Renault Captur 2018 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 10 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.1 | |
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
1000 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.12 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
Renault Captur is 5 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 375 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1120 litres | |
Renault Captur has 66 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 115 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`730 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Renault Captur has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Vitara, so Renault Captur quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 12 200 | 18 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |