Renault Captur 2018 vs Nissan Qashqai 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Renault Captur engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Despite less power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2018 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Captur engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Used also on Nissan X-Trail | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 27 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1598 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 121 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 363 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |