Renault Captur 2018 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.5 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Captur 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 15 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 309 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 47 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`843 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Captur, so Opel Mokka quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |