Renault Captur 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Renault Captur and Nissan Juke have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.9 | |
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2014 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.12 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 354 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1189 litres | |
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 23 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 46 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`762 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 12 200 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |