Renault Captur 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 124 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 7.4 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 786 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 170 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 449 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`671 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |