Renault Captur 2017 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 40 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 28 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 319 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`671 | 2`021 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |