Renault Captur 2012 vs Opel Mokka 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 LPG | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 50 HP less power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 20 NM more than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 6.1 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Captur consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.78 m | |
| Renault Captur is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 12 cm wider, while the height of Renault Captur is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 21 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The Opel Mokka may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`749 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Captur has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |