Renault Captur 2012 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 20 HP less power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Peugeot 3008. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 3008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 3008, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1604 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 55 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 369 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 3008, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`749 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |