Renault Captur 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 40 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1320 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Captur 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.67 m | |
| Renault Captur is 13 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1235 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chevrolet Trax may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`749 kg | 1`888 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`245 kg | 1`384 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 504 kg | 504 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |