Renault Captur 2012 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 70 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 126 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`726 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |