Renault Captur 2012 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is more dynamic to drive. Renault Captur engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Juke 2014 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 797 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 162 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 438 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`726 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Captur has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Juke, so Renault Captur quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |