Renault Captur 2012 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 33 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 95 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`726 | 1`903 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Renault Captur has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kadjar, so Renault Captur quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |