Renault Captur 2012 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 50 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Captur consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that by driving the Renault Captur over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Captur consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 13 cm shorter than the Jeep Renegade, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 26 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. The Jeep Renegade may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 62 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`726 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |