Renault Captur 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Captur is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Renault Captur is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 260 NM | 154 - 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.8 seconds | 11.4 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.6 | 6.1 - 7.7 | |
|
Renault Captur petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.63 m | |
| Renault Captur is 17 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Captur is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 71 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`731 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |