Renault Captur 2017 vs Hyundai Kona 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Captur is available only with front wheel drive, while Hyundai Kona can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Hyundai Kona is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 150 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 260 NM | 147 - 395 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 13.8 seconds | 7.6 - 12 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai Kona are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Captur. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.6 | 3.9 - 7.3 | |
|
Renault Captur petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Kona. On average, Renault Captur equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 158 - 177 mm (6.2 - 7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.55 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Kona, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1235 litres | 1297 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 89 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 62 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Kona. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`731 kg | ~ 1`922 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`185 kg | ~ 1`428 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 546 kg | ~ 494 kg | |
| Renault Captur load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Hyundai Kona. Therefore, Renault Captur is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |