Renault Captur 2012 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Captur is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.9 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 120 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 - 260 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 13.5 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 - 5.4 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Renault Captur petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Renault Captur equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Captur is smaller. Renault Captur is 33 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Captur is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Renault Captur has 95 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`732 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |