Porsche Panamera 2013 vs Toyota Sienna 2010
| Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Hybrid | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Porsche Panamera) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Toyota Sienna) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 187 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Porsche Panamera engine produces 146 HP more power than Toyota Sienna, whereas torque is 188 NM more than Toyota Sienna. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.1 | 11.2 | |
|
The Porsche Panamera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Panamera consumes 8.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that by driving the Porsche Panamera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1215 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2580 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Porsche Panamera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Sienna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Porsche Panamera) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Porsche Panamera is smaller. Porsche Panamera is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Panamera is 33 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 993 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1153 litres | 3810 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage space. Porsche Panamera has 658 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Sienna. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 2657 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Panamera has
|
Toyota Sienna has
| |