Porsche Macan 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Porsche Macan) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mitsubishi Outlander) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 252 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 370 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Porsche Macan is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Macan engine produces 102 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Porsche Macan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.8 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Macan consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Macan could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Porsche Macan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi L 200, Mitsubishi ASX | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
Porsche Macan and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 128 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1795 litres | 1608 litres | |
Porsche Macan has more luggage capacity. Porsche Macan has 372 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Macan (by 187 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 59 200 | 16 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |