Porsche Macan 2018 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 252 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Macan engine produces 72 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, but torque is 60 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power Porsche Macan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.3 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Macan consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Macan could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Porsche Macan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar F-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is smaller. Porsche Macan is 5 cm shorter than the Jaguar F-Pace, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Macan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1795 litres | 650 litres | |
| Porsche Macan has 8 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Macan (by 1145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 63 400 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |