Porsche Macan 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 580 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Macan engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Porsche Macan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Macan consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Macan could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is smaller. Porsche Macan and Volvo XC60 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1432 litres | |
| Porsche Macan has 5 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Macan (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`575 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Porsche Macan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Porsche Macan, so Porsche Macan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 27 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |