Porsche Macan 2013 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 340 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 460 NM | 195 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Porsche Macan is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Macan engine produces 193 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 265 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Porsche Macan reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.5 | |
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Porsche Macan consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Porsche Macan could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Porsche Macan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.68 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
Porsche Macan is larger, but lower. Porsche Macan is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 12 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Macan is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 591 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Porsche Macan has 91 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This could mean that the Porsche Macan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Average price (€): | 29 200 | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |