Porsche Macan 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 252 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Macan engine produces 112 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 174 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Porsche Macan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Macan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Macan consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Porsche Macan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Macan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is larger. Porsche Macan is 38 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Porsche Macan has 90 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`445 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |