Porsche Macan 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 252 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Porsche Macan engine produces 2 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.6 | |
| Porsche Macan consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that by driving the Porsche Macan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Porsche Macan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is smaller. Porsche Macan is 11 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Macan is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 673 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage space. Porsche Macan has 173 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`445 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 42 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |