Porsche Macan 2013 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 252 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is more dynamic to drive. Porsche Macan engine produces 3 HP more power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Jaguar E-Pace. Thanks to more power Porsche Macan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Macan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Porsche Macan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Porsche Macan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Porsche Macan consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar E-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Porsche Macan is 30 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Macan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Porsche Macan has 734 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. This could mean that the Porsche Macan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1077 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 0.54 metres more than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`445 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |