Porsche Macan 2021 vs Honda CR-V 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Porsche Macan is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda CR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 - 440 HP | 145 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 550 NM | 183 - 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 6.4 seconds | 9 - 9.4 seconds | |
| In general, Porsche Macan are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 11.7 | 0.8 - 7.1 | |
|
Porsche Macan petrol engines consumes on average 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 177 - 202 mm (7 - 8 inches) | 153 - 208 mm (6 - 8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Porsche Macan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is larger, but lower. Porsche Macan is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Macan is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 1113 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1503 litres | 2166 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Porsche Macan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 663 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`545 kg | ~ 2`325 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`900 kg | ~ 1`759 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 645 kg | ~ 566 kg | |
| Porsche Macan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Porsche Macan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 39 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |