Porsche Macan 2021 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Porsche Macan is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol) | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 - 440 HP | 133 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 550 NM | 195 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Outlander are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Porsche Macan. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 11.7 | 5.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 177 - 202 mm (7 - 8 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is larger, but lower. Porsche Macan is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Porsche Macan is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 331 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1503 litres | 2217 litres | |
| Porsche Macan has 127 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 714 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`545 kg | ~ 2`355 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`900 kg | ~ 1`775 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 645 kg | ~ 580 kg | |
| Porsche Macan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Porsche Macan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |