Porsche Macan 2013 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Porsche Macan is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 440 HP | 190 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 600 NM | 350 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 6.7 seconds | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.7 | 2.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Porsche Macan petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Porsche Macan equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Porsche Macan is smaller. Porsche Macan is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Macan is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1886 litres | |
|
Volvo XC90 has more luggage space. Porsche Macan has 115 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 386 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Porsche Macan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`537 | ~ 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |