Porsche Macan 2013 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche Macan is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jaguar E-Pace has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Porsche Macan is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar E-Pace can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar E-Pace also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 440 HP | 150 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 600 NM | 340 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 6.7 seconds | 6.4 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 9.7 | 5.2 - 8.2 | |
|
Porsche Macan petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar E-Pace. On average, Porsche Macan equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
| Porsche Macan is 30 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Porsche Macan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Porsche Macan has 734 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. This could mean that the Porsche Macan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1077 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Porsche Macan is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Porsche Macan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`537 | ~ 2`393 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Porsche Macan has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |